Understanding Care Homes

Adult Family Homes vs. Board and Care: Different Names, Same Concept?

Adult family homes and board and care homes look similar but operate under very different licensing rules. What families need to know about both.

By AgeSong Editorial Team 8 min read
Two side-by-side residential houses on a tree-lined street, both with welcoming front porches.

If you have spent any time looking at small residential care homes in different parts of the country, you have probably had this experience: you search for “board and care home near Seattle” and you mostly get results for “adult family home near Seattle” instead. You search for “adult family home in California” and you mostly get results for board and care or RCFE. The terminology changes as you cross state lines, and the change is not just cosmetic.

This guide explains what is the same, what is different, and why it matters when you are searching across states or comparing options for an aging parent.

The short answer

Adult family homes (the Washington term) and board and care homes (the California term, informally) describe the same basic kind of setting: a small licensed residential care home, in an ordinary house, where four to six older adults live together and receive help with daily activities. The model is essentially the same. The licensing rules, the maximum capacity, the staff training requirements, and the specific rules for medications and care are different because each state writes its own residential care licensing law.

Knowing the differences helps you compare apples to apples when you are looking at homes in two different states, or when you are trying to understand what a home in your state can and cannot legally do.

A side-by-side overview

TopicWashington adult family homeCalifornia RCFE (board and care)
Maximum residents66 most common, up to 15 in the small category
Licensing agencyDSHS, Aging and Long-Term Support AdministrationCDSS, Community Care Licensing Division
License typeAdult Family Home (AFH)Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE)
Provider trainingCaregiver and HCA certification, dementia and mental health specialty trainingAdministrator certification, ongoing CEUs
Overnight staffingRequired, typically awake or immediately availableRequired, with rules varying by acuity
Medicaid waiversWell-established (COPES, Community First Choice)Limited (Assisted Living Waiver in some counties)
Inspection recordsPublic via DSHS Provider LookupPublic via CCLD facility search

The table simplifies a lot, but it gives you the structural picture. Now let us walk through what each row actually means in practice.

Capacity and household feel

A Washington adult family home is capped at six residents by law. This is a hard cap, not a typical size. Every adult family home you tour in Washington will have at most six bedrooms (sometimes shared) and a household that operates on a household scale. The result is a remarkably consistent product from one home to another in terms of size and feel.

A California RCFE has a much wider range. The “small” RCFE category, which is what most families are looking for when they say “board and care home,” runs from a single bed (a tiny home with one resident) up to 15 in some configurations. Six is the most common, but you will also find homes with eight, ten, or twelve residents. The eight-bed and ten-bed RCFEs feel quite different from the six-bed homes. They are still small relative to a 100-resident assisted living community, but they have more staff, more rooms, more dining seats, and a slightly more programmatic rhythm. Some families prefer the bigger small homes for the sociability. Others prefer the six-bed homes for the intimacy.

If household feel is the main thing you are optimizing for, a Washington adult family home is probably going to feel more like a household than even a small RCFE in California, simply because the cap is lower and consistent.

Staff training and certification

This is one of the most consequential differences. Washington’s adult family home program has some of the most extensive caregiver training requirements in the country. Caregivers must complete state-approved Home Care Aide certification, dementia specialty training (if the home is licensed for dementia care), mental health specialty training (if licensed for mental health), and ongoing continuing education. The provider, who often lives on-site, has additional administrator-level training requirements. The state publishes the requirements on the DSHS adult family home page.

California requires RCFE administrators to be certified through a state-approved training program and to maintain continuing education. Direct caregiver training requirements exist but are less extensive than Washington’s. This does not mean California caregivers are untrained. Many are very experienced. It does mean that the state-mandated baseline is different.

For families who place a high value on documented, state-mandated training, Washington’s framework is more rigorous. For families who place a high value on the operator’s specific track record, the state-mandated baseline matters less and the individual home’s history matters more.

Medicaid and the small-home model

Washington is one of the relatively few states where Medicaid is a meaningful funding source for adult family home care. Through the COPES program and the broader Community First Choice option, eligible Washington residents can use Medicaid to help cover the cost of adult family home care. Not every home accepts Medicaid placements, and the waitlists vary by region, but the infrastructure is there. This is a major reason adult family homes are so well-established in Washington as a setting for residents who do not have substantial private resources.

California has a more limited Medicaid pathway for RCFE care. The Assisted Living Waiver is available in some counties and does cover certain RCFE services, but capacity is limited and waitlists can be long. Most California RCFE residents are private-pay, supplemented in some cases by long-term care insurance, VA benefits, or family contributions. We walk through all of these funding sources in our Medicaid guide and our seven ways to pay guide.

If your search is in Washington, Medicaid is worth investigating early in the process. If your search is in California, plan on private-pay as the default and treat Medicaid as a possible later-stage option.

Inspection records and transparency

Both states publish inspection and complaint records for licensed homes, and both states make those records searchable by the public. Washington’s Provider Lookup lets you search adult family homes by name, city, or license number, and shows current license status, capacity, recent inspections, and any enforcement actions. California’s CCLD Facility Search does the same for RCFEs.

The two systems differ in how they format and present the data, but the underlying transparency is similar. We walk through how to read these reports in our guide on care home inspection reports.

The practical advice is the same in both states: never put a resident into a home you have not verified against the official database, and always read the most recent inspection report before signing.

Oregon’s adult foster home program

Oregon deserves a brief mention here because it sits in the middle of the Washington and California approaches and is sometimes mistakenly grouped with one or the other. Oregon licenses adult foster homes with a five-resident cap (the smallest in the country). Oregon’s program is more similar to Washington’s adult family home model than to California’s RCFE structure: small, caregiver-focused, with strong state-level training and well-established Medicaid pathways. If you are searching in Oregon, treat it as closer to the Washington model than to the California model.

When the term matters and when it does not

If you are searching in a single state, the term used in that state is the right term to use. Search for “adult family home” in Washington, “RCFE” or “board and care” in California, “adult foster home” in Oregon, “personal care home” in Pennsylvania or Georgia, and so on. The state databases use these terms and so do the homes themselves.

If you are searching across state lines, the term matters less than the underlying model. Look for the small residential care home model in any state where you have flexibility, and use the licensing database for that state to verify what you find. Our terminology pages link out to the state-specific databases for each major term.

How to compare homes across states

If you are choosing between an adult family home in Seattle and a board and care home in Sacramento (because the family is split between both cities), here is how to compare them on equal footing:

  1. Verify each license against the official state database for its state. Confirm capacity, current status, and inspection history.
  2. Ask each home what care levels they are licensed and equipped to serve. Use the same questions on both tours.
  3. Compare the staffing pattern at the same time of day. A home with one caregiver per three residents during the day is materially different from one with one per six, regardless of state.
  4. Compare the overnight arrangement specifically. The state rules differ but the household question is the same: is someone awake or immediately available all night?
  5. Compare cost on a like-for-like basis. Private room, comparable care level, and any extra fees disclosed up front.
  6. Compare the provider’s track record. How long has this home been licensed? Has the same owner been operating it the whole time? How many complaints in the last three years?

For more detail on how to evaluate a home on a tour, read our guide on questions to ask when visiting and our guide on red flags to watch for.

Browse the directories

The fastest way to get a feel for both models is to browse the directories side by side.

When you read the listings with the differences from this guide in mind, you will start to see how the model translates across state lines. The houses look similar. The licenses look different. The questions you bring are largely the same.


Sources and further reading: Washington State DSHS, Aging and Long-Term Support Administration; Washington Adult Family Homes Provider Lookup; California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division; Oregon Department of Human Services, Aging and People with Disabilities; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services — Home and Community Based Services.

Frequently asked questions

What is the practical difference between an adult family home and a board and care home?
The two terms describe the same basic kind of place: a small licensed residential care home for older adults living together in an ordinary house. The differences are in the state-level licensing details. Washington's adult family homes are capped at six residents, with strict overnight staffing and training rules. California's RCFEs (called board and care homes informally) can range from a single bed up to 15 in the small category, with a different set of rules. The model is the same. The fine print is not.
Are adult family homes required to have a licensed nurse?
No, adult family homes are non-medical residential care settings, just like California board and care homes. Some adult family homes employ a registered nurse for medication management or staff training, but it is not a license requirement. When skilled nursing care is needed, it is brought in from an outside home health agency or hospice provider.
Which is cheaper, an adult family home or a board and care home?
Both vary widely by location. In the Seattle metro area, an adult family home with a private room typically runs $5,500 to $9,000 per month, with significant variation by acuity. In the Los Angeles area, a comparable RCFE typically runs in the same range. Outside the largest metros, both tend to be less expensive. The local market matters more than the term.
Can a Washington adult family home accept Medicaid?
Yes, in many cases. Washington has one of the most established Medicaid HCBS waiver programs for adult family homes in the country, through its COPES and Community First Choice programs. Coverage and waitlists vary, and not every home accepts Medicaid placements. Always confirm Medicaid acceptance directly with the home and with the state's local Aging and Long-Term Support Administration office.
Should I look at homes in different states with different terms?
If you have geographic flexibility, yes. Some states have much more developed small-home networks than others. Washington and California are both leaders in the small-home model, but they got there from different directions. Oregon's adult foster home program is also strong. If you are searching across state lines, focus on the model that fits your person's needs rather than the term, and verify each home's license against the state's official database.

Advertisement

Ready to start your search?

Browse thousands of licensed small residential care homes in our directory.

Browse the directory

Free Newsletter

Get the AgeSong Guide

Weekly insights for families navigating care decisions. No spam, ever.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.